Use the web sites provided below to get informed on these issues, but also provide additional references that might strengthen your arguments against or for repatriation.
She illuminates the ways in which history, myth and fiction differ from one another, and why the differences are important. She celebrates the human need for storytelling but distinguishes this from the discipline of history.
Lincoln Essay, Research PaperOver the past few years we? The curator of archaeology, Dr. The Kumeyaay have long sought control over the bones, which they contend are the remains of their ancestors.
In nine readable essays written between and and grouped in three sections "The Politics of History and Historians," "Rethinking History in a Changing World," and "The Enduring Civil War" Foner argues that the historian has a relationship with his or her own world. Many tribes worried that museums were stalling on identifying remains to avoid having to return them.
Contact Us Who owns the past Length of paper: In accordance with new federal regulations, the university has initiated the legal process to transfer the remains to the Kumeyaay in the absence of other claimants.
Their remains are the shared patrimony of all Americans and, indeed, all peoples everywhere. On the one hand, the return of Native American artifacts to their places of origin gives cultural authority to Native groups but at the same time, the absence of these objects from museum collections potentially reduces Native representation in mainstream Who owns the past essay and knowledge.
These rules nudge museums to get on with evaluating their collections, but they have too broad a brush. Looking towards consolidating resources, minimizing risk and greater control over the product from inception to marketing, these mergers incorporate both vertical integration and horizontal integration.
Many Native Americans do not object to studies per se but to analyses that destroy remains. You can use two of those from the available web resources below? Thousands of remains could be made inaccessible to researchers. The paper will be evaluated on your knowledge of the issues at hand and on how clearly your arguments are presented.
Background to the assignment: For Clendinnen, historians cannot be the midwives of national identity and also be true to their profession: However, "everyone and no one" owns the past and "the study of the past is a constantly evolving, never-ending journey of discovery," states Foner history, Columbia Univ.
While the current trend seems to be toward both vertical and horizontal integration, there are possible reasons for the trend to reverse itself. The Kumeyaay have said they may rebury the bones. This is an eloquent, engaging and thought-provoking essay that looks anew at one of the most divisive topics of recent times: Archaeologists and anthropologists of yore treated Native Americans disgracefully, looting their graves and using the remains to argue for the intellectual inferiority of Native Americans to peoples of Caucasian descent.
Using the web sites found at the end of the assignment and other relevant documents web sites, articles, booksyou are asked to either 1 Defend the position of Dr. In effect, they privilege faith over fact.
Fitzpatrick, considers this fortuitous discovery to be possibly significant since the three skeletal remains might be relatively old, dating to the Clovis period. Written on the eve of the History Summit, The History Question offers real insight into this complex, controversial and integral issue.
Penney, Metropolitan Opera Co: Fitzpatrick and the Museum as to the right to be able to use samples of the skeletal remains for radiocarbon dating and perform a skeletal analysis or 2 Provide the point of view of Jamie Bear Track and the Yopi Tribe and explain why these remains should be repatriated sent back to the tribe for reburial.
NAGPRA sought to balance the rights of Native Americans to reclaim ancestral remains with the right of society as a whole to learn about our collective past. Recommended for academic and large public libraries. The new federal regulations are blind to this evidence.
Because of the financial risk involved with new, large-scale ventures, companies that compete in one market find themselves in partnerships elsewhere. The purpose of this assignment is to ask you to think about different perspectives on a contemporary issue.
But what makes this case disturbing is that the Kumeyaay claim is based on folklore. Be sure to consider the many different issues involved in this case including? The controversy over Time Warner? You are required to provide five references. Fitzpatrick or Jamie Bear Track.
Who Owns The Past? However, the presence of a grinding stone and a medicine bundle bag might indicate that these remains were much more recent, dating to later prehistoric times or even associated with a historic Native American tribe. Can we reconcile Native cultural traditions with a scientific narrative?
Hale Mary Fuller Grace Each individual has a vested interest in knowing the past because the past is in everyone.Background to the assignment: Who “owns” the past?Who has the right to define what the past means for us today?
This assignment will ask you to reflect on these questions. This is an eloquent and stimulating essay about a subject that has generated much heat in recent times: how we should record and regard the nation's past. "Who owns the past? In a free society, everyone. Quarterly Essay 23 The History Question: Who Owns The Past?
- Kindle edition by Inga Clendinnen. Download it once and read it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Use features like bookmarks, note taking and highlighting while reading Quarterly Essay 23 The History Question: Who Owns The Past?.
"In the third Quarterly Essay foracclaimed writer and thinker Inga Clendinnen looks past the skirmishes and pitched battles of the history wars and asks what7F 19s at stake what kind of history do we want and need?
Who owns the past? In The History Question, Inga Clendinnen looks past the skirmishes and pitched battles of the history wars and asks what's at stake – what kind of history do we want and need? Should our historians be producing the "objective record of achievement" that the Prime Minister has called for?
Who Owns the Past? The federal government should fix or drop new regulations that throttle scientific study of America's heritage By THE EDITORS on April 1,Download